Ethics of a police officer is a number on important key in law enforcement. The officers must follow a strict code about what they can and cannot do while also having the desecration in a lot of situation. They are able to decide who will and who won’t go to jail because of the crime they may have committed. But this desecration only follows up to a certain point and than they must make an arrest of the suspect. These ethics are based off the peel principals and are a more modern version. Along with them comes the normative ethics. They are a set of questions that come up when considering how one should act out. They are Utilitarism, kantism, egoism, intellectualism, and welfarism. The one that most relates to the job of law enforcement is kantism because it is doing the duty they have been given wither it is right or wrong. Unlike utilitarism which is the belief that everything is right as long as it makes the majority happy. These lead to discovering who the officers are that are follow the code of ethics and who might not necessary be following it. So in other words who are the good cops and the dirty cops.
Along with being given desecration though officers have a certain duty that they need to follow up to. As we talked about the Supreme Court case Graham v. Connor we talked about how the officer was not convicted of using excessive force while taking control of this situation although Graham believed officer Connor did. The case had been about the defendant Graham sewing for excessive force while the officer removed him from the car after suspecting Graham had committed a robbery and was under the influence of drugs. The defendant had entered a store after asking to be taken there by a friend because he was in the early stages of a diabetic shock. Once Graham noticed there were too many people in the store and he wouldn’t be able to get what he needed fast enough he left the store. All of this occurring in moments making the officer believe that Graham had committed a robbery. Officer Connor used force because Graham wouldn’t comply with the officer’s demands because he had entered a diabetic shock. This Supreme Court case has given officers the power to use force in a reasonable matter without being held responsible for any injury that may occur. The objective Reasonableness standard had been created which states that if an “officer” of the same weight and size had been at the scene could they have used the same force at the same moment that the officer did in reality than it is not considered excessive force. This is one of the most important cases that have ever been presented.
As we talked about desecration and force today we worked on using the force. In the classroom we learned why open hand strikes are better than a punch or a closed hand strike. Mr. Lavery and student demonstrated the fighting or open hand closed hand strikes as if they were doing it as a sport and than the street or fighting way also. We practice the street and fighting way to allow us to see that an open hand strike is way more effective than a closed hand strike. We have more power behind our strikes if we are able to step into and put our body weight into it. These strikes are effective because you are not allowing the person to take control of the situation or allowing yourself to break any bones. While the fighter may not fight correctly they may break their wrist and that gives the officer the advantage.